Weblog for students in the UW-Madison School of Library and Information Studies "digital divides" course to post discussion questions and other tidbits. Click here to post.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Bad news for those with impaired eyesight
After numerous publishers expressed concern over the text-to-speech feature on the Kindle 2, Amazon is backing down and letting the copyright holders decide which texts will have this feature enabled.
I just got the Kindle today. I haven't had a lot of time to sit and read it yet, but my initial impressions are good. The text-to-speech feature, not so good. The ability to change the font size is great and it would be helpful for people with poor vision. But if a blind person wanted listen to a book on tape, I'd highly recommend finding one that had an actual human being reading the text over the Kindle's text-to-speech service. I think Amazon realized the service wasn't worth fighting over.
the service itself has a while to go until it's perfected, but i think that amazon backing down is really setting a bad precedent as far as content being affected by technological advancements regarding readability.
i want a machine that gives me as many options as possible with regard to how it can interpret it, and overall, i think that amazon should have fought this, espceially since it sounded like they might actually be able to win, according to many copyright specialists.
You're probably right. People have made good points about the text-to-speech service since I've showed the Kindle to a few people. Just having the option to have something read aloud that isn't available (like newspapers, magazines, etc, which you can get on the Kindle) makes it worth it.
I don't know what goes into conceding on these things. Maybe Amazon wanted to give a little so that they might have some traction on other issues later. Maybe they didn't want the text-to-speech service to be the focal point of their roll-out campaign. Who knows.
Some people have been critical of the Kindle, but it often masks a worry about what this will do to the publishing industry and to authors. What I think...the Kindle is a paradox. It's a technological throwback. The text is entirely the focus, but it's packaged in this new helpful format. I love it. I've already read a short book (part of the 33 1/3 series, rock) and am half through another short one. It really makes me focus, at least so far. Now I'm going to get ready for bed so that I can spend an hour reading about Celine Dion. Check it.
Slate has an excellent article on the Kindle and other text-to-speech technology.
It feels futuristic to wonder how such a feature or service could impact the digital divide if a robot voice could not only read like a human, but respond to human inquiry. But given the pace of tech innovation, it doesn't seem completely unrealistic.
I just got the Kindle today. I haven't had a lot of time to sit and read it yet, but my initial impressions are good. The text-to-speech feature, not so good. The ability to change the font size is great and it would be helpful for people with poor vision. But if a blind person wanted listen to a book on tape, I'd highly recommend finding one that had an actual human being reading the text over the Kindle's text-to-speech service. I think Amazon realized the service wasn't worth fighting over.
ReplyDeletethe service itself has a while to go until it's perfected, but i think that amazon backing down is really setting a bad precedent as far as content being affected by technological advancements regarding readability.
ReplyDeletei want a machine that gives me as many options as possible with regard to how it can interpret it, and overall, i think that amazon should have fought this, espceially since it sounded like they might actually be able to win, according to many copyright specialists.
this is where i heard about it:
http://www.lessig.org/blog/2009/02/caving_into_bullies_aka_here_w.html
You're probably right. People have made good points about the text-to-speech service since I've showed the Kindle to a few people. Just having the option to have something read aloud that isn't available (like newspapers, magazines, etc, which you can get on the Kindle) makes it worth it.
ReplyDeleteI don't know what goes into conceding on these things. Maybe Amazon wanted to give a little so that they might have some traction on other issues later. Maybe they didn't want the text-to-speech service to be the focal point of their roll-out campaign. Who knows.
Some people have been critical of the Kindle, but it often masks a worry about what this will do to the publishing industry and to authors. What I think...the Kindle is a paradox. It's a technological throwback. The text is entirely the focus, but it's packaged in this new helpful format. I love it. I've already read a short book (part of the 33 1/3 series, rock) and am half through another short one. It really makes me focus, at least so far. Now I'm going to get ready for bed so that I can spend an hour reading about Celine Dion. Check it.
Slate has an excellent article on the Kindle and other text-to-speech technology.
ReplyDeleteIt feels futuristic to wonder how such a feature or service could impact the digital divide if a robot voice could not only read like a human, but respond to human inquiry. But given the pace of tech innovation, it doesn't seem completely unrealistic.